now Borthwick: "this world of flow, of streams, contains a very different possibility set to the world of pages"... "watching a 30 min delay on a stream is somewhere between weird and useless"... "Defined use case vs. open use case.. If Facebook is the well organized, pre planned town Twitter is more
like new urban-ism its organic and the paths are formed by the users... "Eno: Its
a misunderstanding to think that the traces of human activity
brushstrokes, tuning drift, arrhythmia are not part of the work. They
are the fundamental texture of the work, the fine grain of it."
SH note: The Now Web is synchronous -- and synchronous tends to favor urgency over importance, drama over efficiency. Phone calls and IMs are to email what the NYT Stream is to the NYT home/front page: More now/synchronous/exciting, but arguably less efficient. Do we choose the excitement of urgency -- over importance? The excitement and human drama of waiting in line at the Apple Store -- and watching a crowd draw a crowd -- is less efficient than waiting a couple days to buy the Apple Thing a couple days after launch with no line. When does excitement & drama trump efficiency? And when does it not?
I'm a big fan of Douglas Rushkoff. His work has been a big influence on me -- from Media Virus to Coercion to Nothing Sacred. Now he's got a new one, "Life Inc" (amazon)
My blurb: "f**k you, douglas rushkoff, for pissing me off and making me re-think everything. anyone who questions everything will have their everything re-questioned. this book is a painful read, and i loved it. gore ain't got nothing on this inconvenient truth. i couldn't put it down while i wanted to burn it, and i learned more from it than i learned in all of college. life inc's education is intense and puts you on a wild ride to seeing the world damn naked and disconnected. this book will either be burned or regarded a masterpiece. required reading for anyone who wants to really understand our world, our economy, our history, and our hope for the 21st century."
My 101 highlights of the book:
the only corp violations worth punishing anymore are those against the shareholders (intro)
the market and its logic have insinuated themselves into every area of our lives (intro)
the line between fiction and reality, friend and marketer, community and shopping center, has gotten blurred (intro)
just as we once evolved from subjects to citizens, we have now devolved from citizens into consumers (intro)
corporatism
itself: a logic we have internalized intour very being, a lens through
wichi we view the world around us... we accept its dominance over us as
preexisting... it just is. (intro)
shop owners did not specialize in actually making anything, but in generating profit thru selling. biz for biz sake was born. 5
consumers are easier to please than citizens 16
independence from one another meant increasing dependence on the companies that served us 18
slowly but surely a new definition of self as 'consumer' penetrated the mass psyche 18
with
no other choice avail, we grow up partnering with corps for our very
identities. a kids selection of sneaker brand says more about him than
his creative-writing assignments do 20
but we all love corporations 20
on
the synthetic landscape of corporatism, corporations are the indigenous
creatures and we are the aliens... we must work through them rather
than through each other 21
the invention of monotheism
purposefully disconnected us from the forces of nature, the invention
of the corp purposefully disconnected us form one another 21
domestic
localities fall over each other to win their business, either too
confused or too corrupt to act in their own best interest 41
where
once an exec had a stake in the conditions surrounding the factory he
commanded and the homes i nwich his workers lived -- if for no other
eason than their procimity to his out home -- now he could hop on a
streetcar and leave the filth and noise behind... labor unrest only
exacerbated this urge to retreat to a home that was both a refuge and a
fortress... arguing that 'society is not friendly'... strangers became
criminals... 47
french historian philippe aries, 'much of life was inescabably public; privacy hardly existed at all" 49
self-sufficiency
was part of the myth of the self-made man in his private esate, so
community property, carpools, or sharing of almost any kind became
anathema to the suburban aesthetic 51
[nothing[ to do with people's real need for land, and everything to do with excess capital's need for a place to grow 55
conformty shouldn't be confused with solidarity. the houses and families within these subdivisions were equal but separate. 61
because doing well meant moving up and out, any gains in status were at the expense of commnuity 62
going into debt, distancing ourselves from our neighbors, and striving for conformity became equated with freedom 63
distracts
us further frfrom the social crisis at hand by recontextualizing it as
a market phenom. after all this, we're still most worried about the
money? 71
whatever once contributed to communit and connected
people is slowly replaces by the real-estate market's simulations of
what community looks like 72
just because a centruy of misguied
social engineering has sterilized our urban and suburban lanscapes
doens't mean that corps offer the best hope of restoring a social
fabric... with the civic center quite literally zoned off the map...
any creation of meaning anca value comes form the outside in. to
participate means to buy 77
victor gruen.. his innovation what
we now call the shopping mall... club meeting rooms in his original
plans... the promise of the malla s a social substitute for Main Street
was revealed to be a farce 79
the
more disconnected people became from one another, the more easily they
could be manipulated... and more dependent on central authorities to
create both value and meaning 89
the invention of the printing press turned reading, lit, and bible study from a group activity to an individual one 92
enlightenment,
individuality, and ageny are all beautiful concepts, but they came
along iwth new allegiances to larger depersonalized and abstract
institutions... and kept people eye's and attention upward and off one
another... aperson with a local sensibilitty understood his role within
the fabric of his farming community or village relationships. now
people were supplying commodies to more centralized businesses 93
the brand replaces p2p human relationships with abstract top-down ones
branding
defined and redefined individuals as subjects, citizens, workers,
consumers, and eventually shareholders always counting on the power of
image and myth to stir people's hearts more effectively than other
people ever could 96 (FB)
human relationships were further
mediated through capital, products, or myths. collectivist impuleses
were shunned in favor of strident individualism and personal
achievement 97
if the oats were bad, you'd know where to find
the man responsible. you knew his face... if his oats were bad he's
lose more than a customer, for you lived and worked in the same town...
had had more at stake than your business. you were more than just one
another's customers; you were interdependent members of a community 98
learn
to feel as good or better about hte picture of the Quaker as you did
about he real person supplying your oats before... who doesn't feel
good about Quakers? they're dedicated to exactly the kind of town
meetings and local sharing that a national oats company would seek to
replace 99
the customer had to know who uncle ben and aunt jemima were just by looking at them once on a store shelf 99
industrialization of the economy required a corresponding desocialization of the people within it 99
while mass production desocialized the worker, mass marketing desocialized consumption 99
it was more effective and sensationalist to call them a mob 102
without any competition, corporatism spread as a national ideology and operating system 106
corp PR men sought to discredit FDR's collectivism by showing how it threateneed the personal freedom of individuals 107
the
AAAA campaigned to defend their industry against muckrakers hopeing to
destroy "public confidence" in advertising. the image industry was in
peril as its targets -- the american public -- attempted to return to
reality 107
rather than see themselves as workers, americans would learn to see themselves as consumers 110
corps
were empowering people, through their consumption, to become more
themselves. at its core, the new tactic would be to promote the idea
that corporatism restored people's individuality, while collectivism
and community forced only stultifying conformity. corporatism would
help you be more you. 110
people devising these schemes don't
feel guilty about any of this becuase their stimulation of consumption
is understood as a public good 111
walter benjamin in 'the work
of art in the age of mechanical reproduction' is that by removing
something from its original context or setting, we kill the sense of
awe that we might attach to its uniqueness 117
once people are
relating to mass-produced symbols and imagery as if they were real,
they are much more susceptible to mistaking any spectacle for real life
117
the brand universe becomes an alphabet through which young
people can assemble their own combinations of meaning and identity 118
atkin:
'brands are being used as credible sources of community and meaning'...
corps have stepped in where traditional meaning-makers have failed
us... the more desocialized we are, the more dependent on atkin's
external prefab meaning systems we become.... real religion, culture or
art's original intent is to communicate values and meaning useful to
human beings... with the intention of making society more functional
and ethical... corporate advertiisng has no such origins... tested to
evoke a response and nothing more... values that don't resonate with
buying things -- such as those that actually bring people into direct
contact with one another -- will be eschewed in favor of those that
require corporate-manufactured intermediaries 120
this
generation of ad strategists... seem oblivious to the biases that were
so explicitly a part of [the origins of] their work... behave as
automatically as the consumers they hope to control, promoting a corp
agenda at the expense of agency 126
gladwell's... justifications to today's generations of compliance professionals 127
rather
than attempt to educate the masses, we should simply dispanse with
facts. the result is a world in which a few educated experts compete
against one another for the 'blink' decisions of uneducated and
unthinking human beings... corps with the most money would presumably
have access to the best psychological technicians 128
exploitation
of community and friendship 'social marketing'. they don't see it as
the destruction of social reality, but its very rehabilitation...
believe they are creating opportunities for people to engage with each
other once again... consumer chosen to be a product spokesperson gets
to step into the role that only a trusted corp could play before...
transcend the role of worker or consumer, and become a living part of a
corp's brand image" 133
personal freedom would become the
rallying cry of one counterculture or another, only serving to
reinforce the very same individualism... we were either individuals in
thrall of the masquerade, or individuals in defiance of it. corporatism
was the end result in either case. 137
instead of annihilating
the illusion of a self, as buddha suggested, the self-centered
spirituality [new age] led to a celebration of self... the
self-improvement craze had begun. instead of changing the world, people
would learn to change themselves 139
christian branding turns
a religion based in charity and community into a personal relationship
with jesus -- a narcissistic faith mirroring the marketing framework on
which it is now based 142
it's a difficult moment to try to return to being a human again, too. even that sounds more like a self-help course than a workable strategy. 144
human beings go from subjects to citizens to worker to consumers to brands. 144
consider
the possibility that neigher our corps nor the money on which they
thrive are real. they weren't here to begin with. we invented them,
together, just as we invented our selves. 144
the rand scientists believed that mutual distrust should rule the day 151
the
brilliance of reaganomics was to marry the antiauthoritarian urge of
what had once been the counterculture with the antigovernment bias of
free-market conservatives 153
human beings are just as likely to share and cooperate as they are to cheat and compete 157
assuage residual guilt the rich man might feel over the inequitable distribution of wealth 159
dispense
with the assumption that human beings were born to be economic
actors... principles of the intentionally corporatized marketplace are
not embedded in the human genome, nor is self-interested behavior an
innate human instict 161
ever expaning debt. sustainable business is no longer an option. everything must grow with the increasing money supply 163
promoted collective investment rather than priate hoarding 165
real people and businesses did best when prosperity was a bottom-up phenomenon, share by all instead of just a few 167
centralized
currecies [are perceived as] the end of a dark age rather than the end
of decentralized prosperity. likewise, historians today are more likely
to point out that the great art and science of the Renaissance was
funded from the top by wealthy patrins, as if to disabuse us of the
notion that such an explosion of imagination and inventiveness could
have occurred from the bottom up .it did. 171
double-entry bookkeeping... defines what can happen and what can't 175
there are 2 economies: the real economy and the speculative economy 176
as
wealth is sucked out of real economies and shifted to the speculative
economy, people's behavior and activities can't help but become more
market-based and less social 177
local currency... bartering...
accepting favors... feels messy and confusing to us...walmart is a big
company...with deep pockets we could sue if something goes wrong...
rather hire a pro rug cleaner, nanny, or taxi... than borrow,
babysitting exchange or join carpool 178
successive disconnects 178
kids
want to be bill gates or to win american idol without wanting to be sw
engineer or caring about singing ... the money & recognition they
envision for themselves is utterly disconnected from any real task or
creation of value 181
adam smith's theories of the market were predicated on the regulating pressures of neighbors and social values 182
credit card companies market credit as a lifestyle of choice 183
in
the zero sum logic of corporatist econ, creating value for anyone other
than the shareholders means taking value away from the shareholders 187
(NOT TRUE)
rhizome is a particularly horizontal and nonhierarchical plant structure 192
things can feel -- or be made to feel -- novel or revolutionary, even though they still consistute biz as usual 193
new opportunities for finding allies and organizing with them. but in the end we're still glued to a tube 195
the
more we are asked to adapt to the biases of our machinry, the less
human we become. in spite of its chaotic and organic propensities, the
intrnet isn't reversing the industrial age role exchange between people
and corps 197
the question is no longer how browsing the
internet changes the way we look at the world; it's which browser we'll
be using to buy and sell stuff in the same old world 199 (DISAGREE)
the internet era [SH: ALOMOST] became about what we could get as consumers rather than what we could create as people 205
for
every disparate community attempting to 'find the others' on the
internet, there is a social network site attempting to sell this
activity in the form of a database to market researchers.... well
meaning or not, these companies are themselves bounded by a corporatist
landscape that works against their own best sentiments... sooner or
later value must be taken from the periphery and brought back to the
center 208 (NO)
only
be disconnecting from corporatism and its dehumanizing, delocalizing,
depersonalizing, and devaluing biases can we muster the strength and
find the tools through which a people-scaled society might be
constructed -- or reconstructed 210
instead
of reconnecting people to their local communities, to one another, or
to the value that tey might be able to create for one another, many
well-meaning efforts against corp power conect people to abstract
ideals and highly centralized organizations... disconnects us further
from the truly bottom-up networks through which we can restore
human-scaled activity 211
like a new form of life, the
corp culture fights for dominance against the humans who crated it.
like a cancer it is willing to bring down its host organism for the
sake of growth 217
most progressive journalism... tends to
frighten and isolate the middle class rather than bring them out of
their homes to improve their communities 220
we cannot market our way out of corporatism 221
employing
the techniques of marketing to repair the ravages of corporatism is a
losing proposition; branding only disconnects us further from the means
to rebuild what we have lost 222
the melt-up (????) 229
we'd
rather send a donation to a middle east peace fund than engage directly
with violence-endorsing extremists at our own place of worship 229
donorschoose... even local needs are kept at a distance 231
we're almost giddy at the thought of our dehumanizing infrastructure crumbling under its own weight 233
as
corp insolvency, home foreclosure, and unemployment increase, our
financial system may prove incapable of providing us the essentials we
need at prices we can afford. through what mechanisms might we do this
for one another instead of depending on the distant companies who took
this responsibility away from us before failing themselves? 235